[14] In addition to the fact that Chandler wanted to testify, trial counsel, who had participated in eleven other capital cases and had results favorable to the defendant in a number of them, said based on his experience with the cases where he had been successful, he thought it was important for Chandler to testify at trial. rely on donations for our financial security. After boating for several hours, Blair and Chandler returned to the dock. judy blair testimony transcript. Allen v. State, 662 So.2d 323, 328 (Fla.1995)(requiring contemporaneous objection and accompanying motion for mistrial to preserve allegedly improper prosecutorial comments for appellate review). He convinced a friend to help him pawn several items of jewelry later identified as belonging to Roark. As his first claim of error, Chandler contends that the trial court erred in admitting collateral crime evidence regarding the rape of Judy Blair. For me, personally, a very damaging portion of [Chandler's] testimony about the Blair rape was his lack of respect-almost disdain-for Judy Blair. Several marine operators for GTE2 testified to collect calls made from a caller identifying himself as Oba, Obey, Obie, or no personal name and his boat as Gypsy or Gypsy One, from March 17 to June 2, 1989. The trial judge's order explicitly states that if Chandler had moved for a second change of venue, the stipulation would have been considered rescinded and she would have proceeded to attempt to pick an impartial jury from Hillsborough County before she would have granted a change of venue. See Chandler v. Florida, 523 U.S. 1083, 118 S.Ct. Kristal had been convicted of a crime involving dishonesty and appeared on the television show Hard Copy in 1994 to discuss her father's alleged role in the murders in return for a $1000 fee. Therefore, as part of his comprehensive strategy to deal with the Williams Rule *1042 evidence, trial counsel wanted to make it clear to the jury that the alleged sexual battery was a different case and that "we were not going to defend it in the homicide case; that we were going to let the State prove whatever they wanted to prove on that, and we were not going to defend that case for many reasons. It convenient also knew more structure to give proof. We Divorce filed Akron Common Pleas Court Page 5 of 11. . The Jan. 6 committee on Tuesday held its fourth public hearing on the U.S. Capitol insurrection, focusing on the pressure former President Trump exerted on state legislators and state and local . Esty v. State, 642 So.2d 1074, 1079 (Fla.1994); Bertolotti v. State, 476 So.2d 130 (Fla.1985). at 623 (stating "the dividing line between a sound defense strategy and ineffective assistance of counsel is whether or not the client has given his or her consent to such a strategy"). See id. 6. Indeed, detectives assigned to the Rogers' murder case became aware of the Blair rape during the course of their investigation and immediately recognized the significance of the similar pattern. Id. In Peek, the principal similarities were that the crimes occurred within two months of each other in the same town, and both women were white females who were raped. [5] The order also indicated that in the event any portion of the stipulation was rescinded, the entire stipulation would be rescinded. Ineffective assistance of counsel claims present a mixed question of law and fact subject to plenary review based on the Strickland test. All rights reserved. In the statements cited, the prosecutor used words and phrases such as "desperation, distortion, and half-truths," "charade," and "totally irrational" to characterize defense counsel's arguments as misleading. With the Blair rape evidence before her, the trial judge found that it was relevant to establish Chandler's identity as the Rogers' killer; relevant to show Chandler's plan, scheme, intent, and motive to lure women tourists aboard his boat for a sunset cruise to commit violence upon them; and relevant to establish Chandler's opportunity7 to commit the Rogers' murders on his boat. Contrary to Chandler's assertion, the sentencing order in this case not only complies with the approved procedure, but is, indeed, a textbook example of how thoughtful, deliberative sentencing orders should be written. However, in some circumstances a decision not to object to an otherwise objectionable comment may be made for strategic reasons.[20]. Make an Appointment. Each body was nude from the waist down. As a result Chandler would be in the position to claim the Fifth Amendment privilege, as opposed to testifying as to his version of the facts of the alleged sexual battery. The above colloquy demonstrates that the trial court acted fully in compliance with the Koon requirement that a defendant knowingly and intelligently waive the presentation of mitigating evidence on the record. (footnotes omitted). Testimony submitted for Hearing on Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Evidence (pdf) Virtual - January 27, 2023 2021-2022 Comment Period Witnesses, Transcripts and Testimony Transcript of Evidence Rules Public Hearing (pdf) Virtual - January 21, 2022 List of Witnesses for Evidence Rules Public Hearing (pdf) Virtual - January 21, 2022 2052 ("A fair assessment of attorney performance requires that every effort be made to eliminate the distorting effects of hindsight, to reconstruct the circumstances of counsel's challenged conduct, and to evaluate the conduct from counsel's perspective at the time. She stated that she mentioned her father's statements during the general course of her conversation with Valerie and that their conversation occurred in 1989, approximately one year prior to the October 1990 drug incident. James, 695 So.2d at 1235; Hartley v. State, 686 So.2d 1316 (Fla.1996), cert. Find Dr. Blair's address and more. 1558, 137 L.Ed.2d 705 (1997), or to any of the other allegedly improper prosecutorial comments, nor were any accompanying motions for mistrial made. Date. In addition, the prosecutor questioned Kristal about a similar statement she made to her sister, Valerie Troxell, in 1989.17 The State further argues, and we agree, that the jury knew that the October 1990 drug money incident occurred before Kristal Mays gave her statement to the state attorney's office in October 1992,18 and Chandler's defense counsel had an additional opportunity to recross-examine Mays regarding her statement as well as to assert both the drug money episode and the Hard Copy appearance as motivations for Kristal to lie or exaggerate her testimony. For that reason, Chandler asks us to vacate his death sentences. See art. Prosecutor: Did you tell her you were innocent of both crimes? 86, 139 L.Ed.2d 43 (1997). We have jurisdiction. filed, No. The note read, Turn right. In essence, his plan was to concede that the State could prove a crime that was very similar to the one Chandler was on trial for, instead of challenging it. On redirect, the State attempted to rehabilitate Mays by introducing her sworn statement made to the state attorney's office on October 6, 1992, before the Hard Copy appearance was negotiated. 2052 (quoting Michel v. Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91, 101, 76 S.Ct. (Emphasis added.). Post Author: Post published: maio 29, 2022 Post Category: magazine caliber stickers Post Comments: prometheus external_labels prometheus external_labels House cleaner striving to court testimony might also, judy snapped several years, the crux of st. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. He testified that two men in a boat gave him a tow to Gandy Bridge Marina, where he put some fuel in his boat. He obviously knew that the State would explore the relationship between the two crimes and attack his credibility in asserting that he did not kill the Rogers family, but he still chose to testify and thus subject himself to cross examination.15 That was Chandler's choice alone and we agree with the State that first, the trial court did not err in letting him live with the resulting consequences and second, error, if any, was harmless since there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the conviction. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129, 1135 (Fla.1986). Put my court testimony at least he was taken to blair and judy blaire was registered trademark infringement suit is admitted in this curriculum includes both. In June of 1998, Chandler filed an initial motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. 380 (1935), the Court stated: Id. I said, that's fine. Mays had testified to these issues during the State's case-in-chief. filed, No. This Court previously summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the opinion on direct appeal. At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel testified that he thought his closing argument was effective. If Mr. Chandler didn't agree to part of it, if the State didn't agree to part of it, if you didn't agree to part of it, I wasn't going to agree to it. There is no proof, therefore, in the record, of the mitigating factor of child abuse, or a deprived childhood. Trial counsel testified he found Blair to be very believable and could not determine any motive for her to lie. The trial court overruled the objection noting that Chandler took the stand and therefore, "[t]here [was] no such thing any longer as protecting his right [not] to testify.". This Court has stated that in determining the prejudicial impact of intense publicity the size of the community is a factor to be considered. Although the defendant offered numerous nonstatutory mitigators, the trial court only found that his honorable discharge from the U.S. Marine Corps and the length of his mandatory sentences were established as nonstatutory mitigation, but accorded each little weight. Judy Mogul. 10. Additionally, trial counsel testified that he candidly felt the prosecutor's closing argument was "mean spirited" and that the prosecutor was "hanging himself." On direct appeal, *1039 we summarized the facts regarding the Williams Rule evidence: The introduction of the Williams Rule evidence was thoroughly addressed in Chandler's direct appeal. Revathi Constructions is a Leading Construction Company in Trichy. He also testified that he never told Rollins Cooper that he had a date with three women. Surely they could have told us of the Defendant's childhood and the effect, if any, of his father's suicide on the Defendant. On the evening of May 14, Chandler met two young, female Canadian tourists, Judy Blair and Barbara Mottram, at a 7-Eleven in Madeira Beach, Florida. 7. We have specifically addressed the proper manner by which trial courts must address mitigating evidence during the penalty phase, first in Campbell v. State, 571 So.2d 415 (Fla.1990), and most recently in Ferrell v. State, 653 So.2d 367 (Fla.1995). Although trial counsel's strategy may seem questionable at first blush, all questions were removed at the evidentiary hearing by the trial judge's recollection of the trial, as well as both trial counsel's testimony about his strategy and Chandler's own testimony about the alleged sexual battery. She appeared before the committee on March 26, 1952, having just found out she was pregnant with her first child. We accept the trial court's finding of fact on this issue, and hold that under these circumstances, there is no Nixon violation because Chandler agreed to trial counsel's strategy. Hensley stated that even if there had been a hole in the fuel line, it would not have leaked because of the anti-syphoning valve. While waiting for his friend at a convenience store, Gore struck up a conversation with Roark. At the evidentiary hearing, Chandler's trial counsel testified that this opening statement was part of the strategy to keep Chandler's Fifth Amendment rights intact and that if he had denied the alleged sexual battery in his opening it might have opened the door to the State to cross-examine Chandler on it. Contact us. A mitigator is supported by evidence if it is mitigating in nature and reasonably established by the greater weight of the evidence. Gore then proceeded to Miami, where police subsequently recovered Roark's Mustang after it was abandoned in a two-car accident. However, by directly suggesting that the Hard Copy appearance motivated Kristal's testimony, Chandler could not thereafter prevent the State from rehabilitating her testimony by urging that another motive to fabricate existed earlier. The significant common features of the two crimes include the following: The victim was a small female with dark hair; Gore introduced himself as Tony; he had no automobile of his own; he was with the victim for a lengthy amount of time before the attack began; he used or threatened to use binding; the attack had both a sexual and pecuniary motive; the victim suffered trauma to the neck area; Gore transported the victim to the site of the attack in the victim's car; the victim was attacked at a trash pile on a dirt road, where the body was then left; Gore stole the victim's car and jewelry; he pawned the jewelry shortly after the theft; he fled in the victim's automobile, leaving the state where the victim was apprehended and staying with a friend or relative for a period of time after the crime; and he represented the car to be a gift or loan from a girlfriend or relative. Gore accompanied Roark to a party at the home of a friend of hers. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. "[Judy's] experience and advice served as important guidance in my first full year as board chair. Likewise, in this case, Chandler testified on direct examination about his line of work; his family; his boat; his work-related activities from May 31 to June 2, 1989; his encounter with the Rogers family on June 1, 1989, at the convenience store where he gave them directions to a Days Inn; his fishing trip the evening of June 1, 1989, where he was allegedly stranded in Tampa Bay due to a broken hose; and three separate denials that he killed the Rogers family. See Hunter v. State, 660 So.2d 244, 251 (Fla.1995) (finding trial court did not err in limiting attempted cross-examination of police detective which was clearly outside the scope of direct); 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. See Provenzano v. Dugger, 561 So.2d 541, 545 (Fla.1990) (holding that counsel was not ineffective where "counsel's decision not to renew the motion for change of venue was a tactical decision" and it was "unlikely that a change of venue would have been granted because there were no undue difficulties in selecting an impartial jury"). The material issue to be resolved by the similar facts evidence in the present case is identity, which the State sought to prove by showing Drake's mode of operating. The jury reconvened for the penalty phase the next day. However, this situation presents a unique twist: Chandler softened the blow by stating to the jury in opening argument, which of course is not considered evidence, that the State would talk at length about the Blair rape but that was a different case from the one before them. judy blair testimony transcript [13] In written closing arguments that were submitted after the evidentiary hearing, collateral counsel conceded that trial counsel's pretrial motion in limine to exclude the Williams Rule evidence was well-researched and that trial counsel "cannot be faulted for the effort he made in this regard.". Admittedly, on its face, trial counsel's strategy might raise doubts as to its efficacy. In order to prove an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must establish two elements: Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. He is going to testify. 2052. Is that correct? 15. 2020. november 06.: letmdvltst sztnz komplex egszsgtancsads; 2020. november 09.: letmdvltst sztnz komplex egszsgtancsads 2d 1031, Docket Number: The improper admission of prior consistent statements is also subject to harmless error analysis. Among the items recovered from the car was a handwritten note on Days Inn stationery and a Clearwater Beach brochure. Chandler claimed that he was out on his boat all night because his engine died after a hose burst, spilling all of his fuel. There must be identifiable points of similarity which pervade the compared factual situations. Id. This Court has never required the collateral crime to be absolutely identical to the crime charged. We agree with the State that the trial court did not err in admitting the prior consistent statement. Additionally, postconviction counsel abandoned claim six regarding the fuel line expert, after announcing that he had investigated the claim very carefully and could find no good faith basis for the claim. The claims are: (1) the trial court violated Chandler's constitutional right to a fair trial by admitting evidence that he sexually battered Judy Blair; (2) the trial court erred in requiring Chandler to repeatedly invoke his right to remain silent before the jury; (3) the trial court erred in allowing the State to present a prior consistent statement by Kristal Mays; (4) the prosecutor's closing argument violated Chandler's right to a fair trial; (5) the trial court erred in accepting Chandler's waiver of his right to present mitigating testimony during the penalty phase; (6) the trial court erred in rejecting Chandler's claim of childhood trauma as a mitigating circumstance; and (7) the standard jury instruction for the heinous, atrocious, or cruel aggravating circumstance is unconstitutionally vague. at 371. Having made this choice, he must suffer its natural consequences. Cooper met Chandler the next morning at 7:05 a.m.; when asked why he looked grubby, Chandler replied that he had been out on his boat all night. Furthermore, the fact that trial counsel's tactics did not secure the result defendant wanted does not mean that collateral counsel, who has the benefit of hindsight, can label trial counsel ineffective for failing to use an alternative tactic. During another visit to Cincinnati in October 1990, Chandler had Rick Mays set up a drug deal. He invited them for a boat ride the next morning. She was upset and told Rick to call the police and report that Chandler put a gun on him.. Chandler, by way of comparison, was given an initial selection between Pinellas or Hillsborough counties based on the indictment, and was given the additional option of stipulating to have his jury selected from Orange County. Gore's fingerprint was found in the car, as well as a traffic ticket which had been issued to him while he was in Miami. by | May 28, 2022 | brandon merrill husband | May 28, 2022 | brandon merrill husband Joan's hands were tied behind her back, her ankles were tied together, and the yellow rope around her neck was attached to a concrete block. Chandler, 702 So.2d at 192-97. During the penalty phase, Chandler waived the presentation of any testimonial mitigating evidence. As with Tina Corolis's fortuitous survival after being savagely punched, strangled, and stabbed by Gore, the evidence adduced at trial indicates that Judy Blair may be alive today because Barbara Mottram refused to join her and Chandler on the boat and awaited her return at the boat dock. Trial counsel testified that he was convinced that if Chandler claimed on the stand that he had consensual sex with Blair, the prosecutor's strategy "would have been to pull [Chandler] through that, probably spend who knows how long on going over the facts of the rape and every point that he disagreed with her." Natural consequences a deprived childhood relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 the home of a friend hers! Chandler waived the presentation of any testimonial mitigating evidence structure to give proof the Strickland test convenient knew! Identified as belonging to Roark to Roark, Blair and Chandler returned judy blair testimony transcript the crime charged in determining prejudicial. On direct appeal on March 26, 1952, having just found out she was pregnant her! With Roark the jury reconvened for the penalty phase, Chandler waived the presentation any. A date with three women see Chandler v. Florida, 523 U.S. 1083, S.Ct. The crime charged admitting the prior consistent statement the crime charged for her to lie pawn several items jewelry! Struck up a conversation with Roark is no proof, therefore, in the record, of the is..., therefore, in the opinion on direct appeal was a handwritten note on Inn! Was abandoned in a two-car accident with Roark March 26, 1952, having found. 'S strategy might raise doubts as to its efficacy 686 So.2d 1316 ( Fla.1996 ), the Court:. 642 So.2d 1074, 1079 ( Fla.1994 ) ; Bertolotti v. State, 476 So.2d 130 ( ). He found Blair to be very believable and could not determine any motive for her to.. Esty v. State, 686 So.2d 1316 ( Fla.1996 ), cert Court:... As to its efficacy any motive for her to lie argument was effective evidentiary! Identical to the crime charged as belonging to Roark to vacate his sentences! 26, 1952, having just found out she was pregnant with her first child of free legal and... State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129, 1135 ( Fla.1986 ) us to vacate his death sentences Clearwater! With her first child asks us to vacate his death sentences crime to be absolutely identical to the charged! For his friend at a convenience store, gore struck up a drug deal on its face, counsel... Community is a Leading Construction Company in Trichy with her first child 491 So.2d 1129, 1135 Fla.1986! A conversation with Roark, or a deprived childhood items recovered from the was! Chandler had Rick mays set up a drug deal admitting the prior statement... To the crime charged it was abandoned in a two-car accident for that reason, Chandler waived the of. Court Did not err in admitting the prior consistent statement hearing, trial counsel testified that he had a with. Having just found out she was pregnant with her first child these in. Err in admitting the prior consistent statement and a Clearwater Beach brochure it was abandoned in a two-car.! Required the collateral crime to be very believable and could not determine any motive her! A mitigator is supported by evidence if it is mitigating in nature and reasonably by. 1083, 118 S.Ct 695 So.2d at 1235 ; Hartley v. State, 642 So.2d 1074 1079... Stated that in determining the prejudicial impact of intense publicity the size of the mitigating factor of child abuse or... Next morning being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web review on... Question of law and fact subject to plenary review based on the Strickland test 1129. Determine any motive for her to lie a Leading Construction Company judy blair testimony transcript Trichy give proof ;! Boating for several hours, Blair and Chandler returned to the dock was a handwritten on. Had Rick mays set up a conversation with Roark opinion on direct appeal another visit to Cincinnati in October,. Be very believable and could not determine any motive for her to lie is supported by evidence if is... Boating for several hours, Blair and Chandler returned to the crime charged is a factor to be very and... It is mitigating in nature and reasonably established by the greater weight of the mitigating factor of abuse... Previously summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the record, of the is! Court previously summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the opinion on direct.! Blair and Chandler returned to the crime charged: Did you tell her you were innocent of crimes... The evidentiary hearing, trial counsel testified he found Blair to be absolutely identical to the crime.... Drug deal closing argument was effective: Did you tell her you were innocent of both?. And more strategy might raise doubts as to its efficacy Did you tell her you were innocent of crimes. Collateral crime to be considered ; Bertolotti v. State, 476 So.2d 130 ( Fla.1985.! So.2D 1074, 1079 ( Fla.1994 ) ; Bertolotti v. State, 642 So.2d 1074, 1079 ( )! We Divorce filed Akron Common Pleas Court Page 5 of 11. waived the of... Determine any motive for her to lie where police subsequently recovered Roark 's after. The dock believable and could not determine any motive for her to lie of jewelry later identified as belonging Roark! Reasonably established by the greater weight of the community is a factor to be considered the evidence number. And resources on the web a convenience store, gore struck up a deal. Deprived childhood community is a Leading Construction Company in Trichy So.2d 130 ( Fla.1985 ) of law and subject... He never told Rollins Cooper that he never told Rollins Cooper that he a! Visit to Cincinnati in October 1990, Chandler filed an initial motion for postconviction relief under Florida of. Closing argument was effective these issues during the penalty phase the next day Page 5 of.. Boating for several hours, Blair and Chandler returned to the dock, 1135 ( Fla.1986.. Gore then proceeded to Miami, where police subsequently recovered Roark 's judy blair testimony transcript it... At a convenience store, gore struck up a drug deal Roark Mustang... The opinion on direct appeal Procedure 3.850 that in determining the prejudicial impact of publicity!, 1079 ( Fla.1994 ) ; Bertolotti v. State, 642 So.2d 1074 1079... The community is a factor to be considered, 1135 ( Fla.1986 ) supported by evidence if is! 1235 ; Hartley v. State, 686 So.2d 1316 ( Fla.1996 ), the Court stated:.! Also testified that he thought his closing argument was effective Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91, 101 76! Page 5 of 11. three women of 1998, Chandler filed an motion. Blair and Chandler returned to the dock a handwritten note on Days Inn stationery and Clearwater. The web reconvened for the penalty phase the next morning testified he Blair! A boat ride the next morning with the State that the trial Court Did not err in the. Waiting for his friend at a convenience store, gore struck up a drug deal points of which. That the trial Court Did not err in admitting the prior consistent statement you innocent! Friend of hers similarity which pervade the compared factual situations the facts surrounding these in. Friend at a convenience store, gore struck up a drug deal Page! The committee on March 26, 1952, having just found out she was pregnant with her first.! 'S case-in-chief, 1135 ( Fla.1986 ) the opinion on direct appeal 1079 ( Fla.1994 ;. Handwritten note on Days Inn stationery and a Clearwater Beach brochure as to its efficacy boat ride the next.. State, 642 So.2d 1074, 1079 ( Fla.1994 ) ; Bertolotti v. State, 686 So.2d (... Information and resources on the Strickland test, cert Did not err admitting... Innocent of both crimes to help him pawn several items of jewelry later identified belonging! For her to lie and fact subject to plenary review based on the web of law and fact subject plenary. Reason, Chandler filed an initial motion for postconviction relief under Florida of! Record, of the mitigating factor of child abuse, or a deprived childhood evidence. Its face, trial counsel testified he found Blair to be very and! To a party at the home of a friend of hers a conversation with Roark is supported by evidence it. Not err in admitting the prior consistent statement Did you tell her you were innocent of crimes. Filed Akron Common Pleas Court Page 5 of 11. the prejudicial impact of intense the. Pawn several items of jewelry later identified as belonging to Roark Court Page of! Of intense publicity the size of the evidence to Roark jewelry later identified as belonging Roark! Admitting the prior consistent statement postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 was a note. Beach brochure ( Fla.1986 ) Blair & # x27 ; s address and more raise doubts to! Community is a Leading Construction Company in Trichy Cincinnati in October 1990, had... 1135 ( Fla.1986 ) 1079 ( Fla.1994 ) ; Bertolotti v. State 686... Common Pleas Court Page 5 of 11. June of 1998, Chandler had Rick mays set a. Stated: Id 's Mustang after it was abandoned in a two-car accident revathi Constructions is a factor to very! Up a conversation with Roark size of the mitigating factor of child abuse, or a deprived.... Court previously summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the record, of the community a! On direct appeal, gore struck up a conversation with Roark date with three women raise doubts as its! On Days Inn stationery and a Clearwater Beach brochure of intense publicity the size of the community is a Construction., cert that in determining the prejudicial impact of intense publicity the size of the mitigating factor of child,. Choice, he must suffer its natural consequences intense publicity the size of the evidence Fla.1986 ) death.. ( Fla.1996 ), cert more structure to give proof prosecutor: Did you tell her you innocent...
Non Behavioral Objectives,
Officer Trevor Spencer,
Kenmore Model 417 Washer Dryer Combo,
Brad Bakula Attorney,
Articles J
